I wonder if the dhimmi Eurabian non-Muslim populations understand the difference. Tamimi, whose duplicity was unmasked here, also reiterated his support for suicide jihad martyrdom attacks. “Firebrand Islamic academic: ‘dying for your beliefs is just,’” from the Daily Mail, with thanks to John Doe:

A British-based Muslim radical appeared to back suicide bombing yesterday when he claimed that dying for your beliefs was ‘just’.Dr Azzam Tamimi told an 8,000-strong crowd that standing up for your principles was the ‘greatest act of martyrdom’. The 51-year-old was speaking at the ExpoIslamia convention in Manchester.

The Palestinian-born academic – who previously boasted he would carry out a suicide bombing in Israel – also repeated his public backing for Hamas, which remains banned in the UK.

He said: “The greatest act of martyrdom is standing up for what is true and just. Martyrs are those who stand up and stand up in defiance of George Bush and Tony Blair. You stand up to them and you say desist. Stop this injustice. Stop this oppression.”

Dr Tamimi claimed the war on terrorism was a war on Islam. “We are Muslims in Europe, not European Muslims,” he added.

“Being fair and just means finding the middle path. The middle path is not rubbing shoulders with Tony Blair and George Bush.”

The crowd erupted with cheering and applause when he said that Israel had been defeated by Hezbollah. He continued: “Hamas is making sacrifices for you. We tell this government Hamas is not a terrorist group. It is elected by the people of Palestine. We are not terrorists. We are defenders of the truth. Fighting those who invade Muslims is a just cause.

“The government is trying to turn the war on terror into the war on Islam.”

In November 2004, Dr Tamimi told the BBC that he was prepared to be a suicide bomber if the opportunity arose. In an interview which was roundly condemned, he said that 2sacrificing myself for Palestine was a noble cause. It is the straight way to pleasing my God and I would do it if I had the opportunity”.

Dr Tamimi, a prominent member of the Stop The War coalition, is married with three children and lives in Willesden, North West London. After coming to Britain from the Middle East more than 30 years ago, he and his family have become British citizens and live in a council block.

He has repeatedly spoken out in support of Hamas and described their suicide bomb tactics as ‘the courage of man’.

In July 2004, he invited the radical Sheikh Yusuf Al Qaradawi to the UK. Al Qaradawi, who spoke at a taxpayer subsidised conference in London – has called for a war on Jews and the execution of homosexuals.

I was surfing through The Lab on ABC.net.au
(http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/health/HealthRepublish_1710838.htm) and I came across an article that said the ‘Y’ chromosome is facing its demise. It went on to say that not too far into the future people born without a Y chromosome would split off from those with, and eventually evolve into a new species of hominid. It got me to thinking that obviously, the scientists must have been doing their research in Thailand.

Have you noticed how difficult it is to tell what sex many Thais are today? I mean, there you are walking down the street and you spot this really nice set of buns mincing ahead of you. You speed up. As you pass you throw a quick look sideways and it’s instant disappointment. “Oh-oh! What the heck is that?”

A business associate of mine, a Russian, came to my office a couple of times with his assistant. It was slim, short even for a Thai, with hair cut short in a somewhat mannish style, a business shirt open at the neck, and a pair of slacks.

Hmmm. Dressed like a man, but with that squeaky voice, it could be a butch dyke. I couldn’t take my eyes of her/him (shim?). I ogled the chest several times wondering if I could really see a couple of bumps there. Or was it was just the way the shirt hung? If they were there, they were certainly very small.

Each time my associate came to visit I kept looking, hoping for a clue. I even dropped a pen I was handing over in the hopes of getting a squizz down the front of its shirt. But no luck. The T-shirt under the business shirt stopped that stratagem.

In the end I gave in and waited till it was out of earshot one day. Then I asked my Russian client what sex it was. He replied he wasn’t entirely sure either. Even though it had worked for him for six months! He ventured that it was actually a lesbian because it turned up with a female in tow once and introduced her as ‘girlfriend’. The jury is still out.

So, why are there so many trans-gender types in Thailand? Does Thailand have more homosexuals of both persuasions than other countries? Do a lot of Thais sit somewhere inbetween?

Well, at first glance it would appear so. However, I commented on this to a gay friend of mine once and he laughed at me. He said, “How many of those straight looking Western businessmen you mix with do you think are gay?” Then he answered the question himself. “A lot more than you would ever imagine, here and back home.”

I have to confess I looked at him dumbstruck. The thought had never occurred to me. I knew some of them were gay. It was obvious. The limp wrists, the hissed sibilants, even the eyes batted at me on a couple of occasions. But that ultra-butch Managing Director who drank beer with the guys? Or the hotel manager who was the scourge of any slackers on his staff? How could you tell? After that conversation I was always much more observant at business meetings. But I have to admit I didn’t spot many.

The Westerners that are obviously trans-sexual or who dress as females can never achieve any real feminine beauty. With heavy beards, or obvious Adams apples, there is no way they can ever look as beautiful as any Thai katoey.

But that doesn’t answer my first question, does it?

I believe it’s the rice. Yes, that’s right. Think about it for a moment.

The farmers have been spreading all that fertilizer on their fields for the last 25 or 30 years. What is in that stuff? Well, among other things it contains hormones to encourage growth. It sure does that. Thailand has had bumper crops for years now. And in that time I have noticed a growing increase in the number of different-sex people here as well.

The CIA website shows that more males are born. But from age 15 onwards the number of females increases:

Thailand Population Figures:
0-14 years: 22% (male 7,284,068/female 6,958,632)
15-64 years: 70% (male 22,331,312/female 22,880,588)
65 years and over: 8% (male 2,355,190/female 2,821,805) (2006 est.)

The early years determine the path our lives will take. Perhaps with more males around at that time Thai boys to choose to go the other way. After all, some animal species do the same when there are more males than females.

By the time they reach 15 they are pretty well set in their ways, and a significant percentage have died off along the way. That leaves more females from then on. Maybe some segments of both sexes change in an effort to balance the equation.

Anyway, the reality is that Thailand has an awful lot of people who were born Arthur but have decided they are really Martha, and vice versa. The boys who decide to go full female aren’t like the ones in the west either. Some of those who change their sex are more beautiful than any woman you are likely to meet. It’s downright hard to tell sometimes.

Take my brother Andrew. He came up here a few years ago and I thought I would introduce him to the nightlife in stages. Our first stop was at the Safari Bar in Patpong where he was quickly surrounded by a bevy of girls after I told them he was a Bangkok virgin. They were feeding him his beer, massaging his back, groping him, kissing him. You know the drill. I stood back and drank my beer enjoying his enjoyment.

We walked out after the beer and he turned to me and said, “Marc, that’s the best value for a beer I’ve ever had!” I just grinned and told him there was more and better to come. So we dropped by the King’s Castle bar. I haven’t been there for a long time, so I don’t know what it’s like now, but back then it was well known for employing the most beautiful katoeys in town. We sat down and ordered a beer and watched the bodies gyrating around the chrome poles. His eyes were popping out of his head. I leaned over and asked him which one he liked.

He couldn’t answer at first, but eventually he pointed to a leggy, full-breasted girl who was giving him the eye. I leaned across again and told him it was a boy.

“No! You’re kidding. It couldn’t be.”

So I pointed out the surefire giveaways; the slightly prominent Adam’s apple, the large hands, the rough elbows. The look on his face should have been recorded for all time.

Getting back to the topic, though, it is difficult to tell the sex of a lot of Thais these days. Look around you when you walk down the street. Drag your eyes away from the feast of females sashaying by for a moment and look at the other Thais. How many of them do you think are ‘men’, or even ‘women’?

Maybe the scientists are on to something. Could Thailand be the first country in the world to start losing the Y chromosome? Are we seeing the birth of a whole new addition to the human race?

You’ll see them in offices, department stores, on the Skytrain…everywhere. Once you start to look, you’ll see them all over the place. Or maybe you won’t….

A short news piece appeared on the BBC website this afternoon in which a mention is made of the Police tipping off the Muslim community:

“Police had spoken to a good number of community leaders to make them aware that a major operation was under way.”

This is an incredible statement for the police to make and shows how the Police place a greater emphasis on ensuring smooth relations with the Muslim community than relations with the non-Muslim majority.

Here we have British police, no doubt at a senior level talking to representatives of the very community from which these terror suspects emerge WHILE the operation is still under way.

Putting lives at risk

This must raise a question over the loyalties and professional sensibilities of the senior security officials to their own staff and to the general travelling public. Every beat office, every investigator and every security agent places his or her own life firmly on the firing line whenever they go on duty. The twenty one terror suspects arrested were, according to police reports just a small element of a much larger group. How many individuals within the Muslim community have been alerted by their community representatives that a Police was underway and have now taken steps to avoid their apprehension? At any time were any police and other security officers placed at risk because of this blatant disclosure of information to smooth relations with the Muslim community?

Further it is important to note that there was no parallel “tipping off ” of the non-Muslim majority. Police could have alerted radio and tv stations in the early hours that British airports and international flights were the suspected targets of the religious fanatics and that those with travel plans on Thursday should stay away, partly to avoid the inconvenience and delay but more importantly to stay away from buildings and the infrastructure which may have been a target of the crazed bomb plotters. Muslim community leaders would undoubtedly have passed on the Police information to their family and friends. How many potential Muslim travelers were alerted by their community leaders and avoided the disruption and inconvenience of delayed and cancelled flights?

Why is there one set of rules for Police dealings with the Muslim community and another set for Police dealings with the non-Muslim majority.

Is it a case that the Police are happy to continue playing the role of “dhimmis” and act only with the cognisance and approval of Muslim community leaders?

Note: dhimmi – a non-believer (i.e. non Muslim) who is given permission to live and work under Muslim rule.

I’m a child of the Flower Generation. That doesn’t mean I used to go around wearing flowers in my hair, well not much of the time. But we believed that we could create a better world than the one our parents had given us. We were called all sorts of names: Baby Boomers, Hippies, and a lot of much worse names. Among the things we thought we could change was the ‘slavery’ of women.

Back in the 1950’s the ideal was for a woman to get married, have kids and become a good wife and mother. She was not allowed to have any ideas of her own. Instead, she was expected to keep a spotless house, look after the kids, and cater to her husband’s every whim. She did what her husband told her, submitted to his tyranny, and shut up. She was, in effect, a household slave.

By the time the 1960’s rolled around many women were getting burned out by this regime. Along came the ‘little yellow pill’ the Rolling Stones sang about. Women were getting zonked out all day just to cope with their humdrum little lives. That’s when many of them started taking an interest in the Feminist Movement.

The feminist movement is not a modern invention. As far back as the early 19th century women tried to change how men treated them. Women like Susan B. Anthony, Clementina Black, Elizabeth Blackwell, and Mary Ann Shad Cary the first American black woman to graduate from Howard University Law School and first Black woman to vote in a federal election, were the real pioneers.

Then in the late 1960’s along came Germaine Greer, an Australian feminist who advocated women burn their bras to free themselves. So then we men had lots of floppy boobs to look at. That was nice. Unfortunately, this just made men think the feminists were a bunch of daft dames who weren’t worth taking seriously.

On the other side of the coin, Bella Abzug, a civil rights and labor attorney elected to Congress from New York City, and even Madelaine Albright the first female Secretary of State, made their mark in the US government and struck telling blows for the feminist movement. They were the vanguard of a new wave of women who were moving into what had been male-only domains before.

But to us common men, feminism was a totally new concept we had to come to terms with. Unfortunately, we were swayed by our wives and girlfriends who thought feminism meant a reversal in the traditional roles. Suddenly, we had women trying to wear the trousers and dictate how things should work. The teething pains were many and difficult.

The result was a generation of male wimps who were too scared to argue with their women. Instead, they bowed down to all the feminist demands. We were expected to become much more ‘touchy feely’, more in touch with our ‘feminine side’, and to do what our women expected.

Not all of us thought this was a good idea, especially as we saw what was happening to some of our male brethren. The sight of a man crying at a chick-movie was just sickening. When I met a woman and she started trying to tell me what to do she soon got a shock. I would explain to her that there were some things I would do and some I would not. In other words, I marked the line that she was not allowed to cross. Some of them were horrified and the relationship ended right there and then. Good riddance!

Overall, though, I found that showing them who was boss paid off big. I gained their respect. Let’s face it, women need to be pulled into line sometimes. They get emotional and manipulating at times, especially around that time of the month. That’s when men need to be especially vigilant and not take any shit from them.

Now don’t get me wrong. I have no trouble with caring what my women need, both in and out of the sack. I am quite happy to empathize with their feelings. But I drew the line at kow-towing to their every whim, especially if they start using their ‘feminine wiles’ to try and make me do what they want. For example, if my wife starts getting bitchy near that time of the month I head out the door for a couple of days on a business trip. Even if I don’t have any clients to go and visit, I go somewhere and conduct research for my business. Pattaya is always a good place business! – Stick> By the time I get home again she has got over it and things are back on an even keel again. I get some work done, she appreciates the time alone, so we both win.

Selfish? No, I don’t think so. I think it has preserved our marriage and made it much stronger. She respects me and knows she has to behave herself or I leave. It also creates an element of insecurity, not knowing if I will just keep going one day. She tries extra hard to make nice-nice when I get back.

THE FEMINAZIS

A few years ago there was a story in the Bangkok Post about a group of feminists who had arrived in Thailand determined to ‘save’ the poor girls working in the sex industry. They descended on Patpong and started trying to preach to the girls there. A few weeks later there was another story in the Post about the results of their efforts. One of their spokesmen announced that they were changing their focus. They had come to realize that the girls weren’t the victims. The men were! I had to laugh at that. It didn’t take them too long to realize the reality of the situation, did it?

Now, before you start reaching for your pen to point out my word usage in the paragraph above let me tell you that I refuse to spout that politically correct rubbish the feminists demand. I will not use spokesperson, or even worse spokeswoman. The fact is, spokesman is the original and legitimate word to use, no matter what gender the speaker.

When men first come here they are victims of the Western feminazis. They are amazed at the totally different interaction between men and women in Thailand. Of course, this is what unhinges so many of us too. I can’t deny it. I went through it just like you, so don’t feel too bad. The truth is, when we get here we are like kids in a sweet shop. So many to choose from and so easy!

But when you have lived here a while you look around and realize that there is a heck of a lot more to Thailand than meets the eye. Take our reaction to the Thai men. So many of them seem like kids, even when they are in their 30’s and 40’s. Why is this?

Looks are deceiving. They are not assertive like us. They seem to be very unassuming and ineffective. On the surface this is true. If you go out for a night on the town with them they will get drunk and make inane and silly comments. They really let their hair down. You have to be careful though. They will try and give you girls, or get you into situations you would never even consider back home. You have to walk a fine line between keeping them happy, not insulting them, and maintaining your own dignity. They can be very childlike one minute and then as hard-nosed as any western businessman the next, but in a totally different way.

If you don’t believe me, try doing business with a Thai man. You will soon find that he is very polite, malleable and eager to please while you talk to him. However, as soon as you walk away, everything you have agreed may unravel if it doesn’t suit him. He will then start asking you to make changes until he gets the deal he wants. No matter how hard you try to steer things back to your original agreement, nothing will happen if you don’t start compromising. If you do not negotiate very carefully you will walk away with little or nothing of your original deal in hand. The Thai male can be a lot tougher than you imagined when he wants something.

They get this from their women. The truth is, Thai women exert a very strong influence on society. There is no need for a Thai feminist movement. They have run things behind the scenes for centuries. They coddle their sons well beyond the time western mums do. This is why Thai men seem so ‘weak’ to us. They are used to being looked after by their women. They don’t have to worry about equality. Both sexes in Thailand know what they are and don’t try to be what they are not….well, with the exception of the katoeys, but that is another story, isn’t it?

Handling Thai bargirls is an art and if you are a newcomer you are going to fall into all the traps these girls can spring. Just because they look sweet and appealing and they are good in bed, don’t be fooled. They are tough and ruthlessly devoted to prying as much money out of your wallet as possible. They have centuries of practice manipulating men behind them. They will lie, cry, get angry, and accuse you of wrongdoing when you know full well she is the one at fault. You could catch her in bed with another man and she will deny it without wavering. She will turn it completely around and accuse you instead of some imagined wrongdoing. She will get you so confused that you won’t know where you stand.

If you think western women wear the pants, then Thai women wear full suits of body armor. The only way you can win and have a good time without getting taken to the cleaners is to realize this and be prepared to make the rules. If she threatens to go find a richer man, shrug and tell her to go. Turn around and walk away. I guarantee she will come running right back to you when she sees you are serious. If she doesn’t, what have you lost?

Stop thinking she is the only girl for you. Bullshit! There are millions of them waiting for you. All you have to do is make the choice. Are you going to be the victim the feminazis have turned you into? Or are you going to take back your manhood and enjoy the fruits Thailand has to offer? The choice is yours.

What are the two most controversial subjects for discussion? Why politics and religion of course, so I am going to wrap them both up in a rant that has been on my mind for a long time. So here goes. Hang on to your seats, because this is going to be a doozy.

I was raised as a Roman Catholic. My mother was a rabid catholic who forced us kids to go to church every Sunday. Since I also went to a catholic school I had religion rammed down my throat by the nuns every day too. But as I progressed through primary school I began to question things. I just couldn’t reconcile the teachings with what went on in my life. I can’t remember too many days when I didn’t get at least one beating at home or school. These weren’t just a quick cuff across the ears or something. No. At school it was a cane across the back of the legs or across the middle joints of my fingers. I still have broken veins there as a result. I was just a normal high-spirited kid. I wasn’t doing anything evil. I guess the nuns had a different viewpoint. I remember one told me I would go to hell if I looked down a woman’s cleavage. Oh, oh! I’m doomed!

The beatings at home were sometimes even more savage, especially if my mother lost her temper, which was often. Out would come Dad’s belt, or a piece of wood, or whatever was handy, and she would lay it on for all she was worth. Now she’s old she complains that I live too far away and I never go and see her. I wonder why?

What finally made me realize that the Catholics were not for me was the day I watched the local priest tie the school bully to a pole in the schoolyard and horsewhip the kid in front of the whole school. Now don’t get me wrong. That kid was the bane of our lives. He would beat us smaller kids up all the time. What really got me thinking though was that I was watching a ‘man of god’ who smoked like a chimney, had a severe drinking problem, and bet the takings from the collection plate on the horses beating up a 12 year old. Everyone knew about the priest’s peccadilloes, but no one would say anything. He should have been setting an example of love and caring. Instead, he was worse than many of the ‘sinners’ who went into his confessional box.

Although I continued going to church every Sunday until well into my early teens, it was only to appease my mother. I had no interest in the boring sermons, the smelly incense, and the bullying priest.

It wasn’t until I left home that I made the final break. From then on I took very little interest in religion, until I ran into a bunch of do-gooder Salvation Army people one day when I was in my early twenties. I was going through a bad time and they helped me get back on my feet. I was tempted to join them at first. But their tacky uniforms and the hymn singing on street corners playing badly out of tune instruments to a bunch of jeering sinners didn’t really turn me on.

A couple of years later I was wandering through Hyde Park in Sydney when I spotted a large crowd gathered around one of the soapbox speakers. He wasn’t much to look at. Webster had bad teeth and terrible halitosis, a gift from the British National Health. His clothes were very English working class. Not very clean, and a bit threadbare. His oratory, however, was incredible. He claimed to be a Warlock in the Wicca religion. It was obvious he was well read. He could discourse on a wide variety of topics. The big attraction, though, was how he handled hecklers. Webster would shoot them down in flames with a pointedly amusing retort that left most of them dumbstruck. It was a pleasure to watch him in action.

I got to know him and he invited me to join the after speech soirees at his home. There I met about 20 other seekers like myself. Perhaps Webster could enlighten us.

I listened to him for months, absorbing the wisdom he had culled from the ancient Druid religion. He was watching me too, and one day he pulled me aside and told me that he didn’t think I believed in him enough. He was right. After he told us one day that we should never have inoculations I started having my doubts. When I asked what he proposed instead, he said to use natural healing instead. If natural healing was so wonderful, I asked myself, why hadn’t it eliminated smallpox, measles, and so on long ago? Soon after that I left Webster and his crew of adoring acolytes. I was just too much of a doubter. I needed rational answers that would guide my life. I didn’t need a self-styled guru who demanded total belief and obedience.

However, being a Wiccan did have its advantages at least once. One day a Mormon duo knocked on my door hoping to sell me their brand of tripe. I opened the door, recognized the black trousers, white shirts and black nametag and told them not to waste their breath. I was a Wiccan Warlock. You should have seen the looks on their faces! They backed down the stairs intoning that I was evil, the devil, a blight on mankind, and so on.

I remained a skeptic after that and got on with my life. I traveled and one day I ended up here in Thailand. At first, I thought the Buddhist way of life might be what I was looking for. I went to one of the big temples and met some of the western monks to discuss the Dharma with them. I found some of it very enlightening, but I was still very wary of any organized religion. Thai Buddhism was very organized. I didn’t fancy the regime of denial imposed on the monks. That wasn’t for me. In addition, I found some of the western monks were somewhat naïve. I was pretty sure that some of them couldn’t cope with everyday life and had retreated to the monk hood as a way to avoid life’s hardships. In my mind, they were the walking dead. They had devoted their lives to preparing for death.

Ok. So what was next? I’d looked at two of the three great religions in depth. Neither of them offered me what I was looking for. So one day I went to the Pakistani Embassy and asked if I could have a Koran to study. I was greeted politely and shown into a drab room with a table, two chairs, and walls painted halfway up in institutional green. I sat there patiently wondering what would happen next. The door opened and a dapper man in his mid-thirties with a thin moustache walked in. He introduced himself and asked me if I would mind answering some questions. I had no problem with that, and told him so.

He asked me about my religious beliefs.
Currently none, but I was a seeker, I assured him.

If they gave me a copy of the Koran would I look after it and ensure that it was never desecrated?
Sure thing, I told him. I want to read it to get some insight into Islam.

Did I think I would convert to Islam?
Well, I can’t answer that right now. My first step is to read the Koran and then think about it.

Would I like to meet with a mullah and have him instruct me in the Koran?
No, not right now. I wouldn’t want to waste anyone’s time at this stage. If, after reading the Koran, I felt I would benefit from further instruction I would return to arrange further instruction and discussion.

And on it went. Eventually, he led me out to reception where a brand new copy of a beautifully bound Koran awaited me. I was asked to sign a book acknowledging that I had taken delivery, and I was ushered out the door by the still smiling dapper man.

I returned home and started to read. I had read the Bible for many years, so when I opened the Koran I was immediately struck by the similarities in the two books. The Koran uses much more flowery language, but the basic story is the same. My old friend the Archangel Gabriel is a very powerful figure in the Koran. He seems to be the avenging arm of Allah. As I read the Suras I got a feel for the philosophy behind Islam. Both the Bible and the Koran have some very violent people and events in them. The Old Testament matches the Koran pretty well there. However, the Bible does preach a lot more peace and love. The Koran dwells more on forcefully converting others to Islam. I don’t recall reading that women were inferior to men and that they should be wrapped completely in black, either. In fact, the Koran talks about women as equals. I wonder why Muslim women don’t do something about gaining their freedom from the tyranny their men have imposed on them?

After considerable thought I realized that Islam was not what I was seeking either. So that left me back to being an atheist again.

Now, one of the problems we atheists face is that we don’t have anywhere we can meet to discuss our non-beliefs. We have no organization. It’s difficult to talk about a belief you don’t have, so we tend to be left out in the cold. Whenever I’m asked what religion I am I have to answer ‘none’, which raises a few eyebrows. Although, if I think having a religion might sway my questioner to do what I want I might say I am Buddhist. I’m not lying. I really do think that Buddhism offers a lot more than the other organized religions. I’m just not the joining type who enjoys going to temples and following worshiping formulas. I prefer to think for myself.

Now, this brings me to the political part of my rant. I believe that governments are elected to run a country efficiently. They should not interfere in our personal lives. They should make sure that the infrastructure is maintained so that it functions properly, and they should collect enough taxes to ensure that they can do their jobs well. That’s all.

Somewhere along the line we seem to have lost sight of what politicians really are. Back in the last couple of centuries, governments tried various social experiments to ‘help’ their constituents. These all failed spectacularly, and in many cases the experiments killed many of the people they were supposed to help.

Then we had the big social revolution of the 1960’s and ‘70’s. I was there and I was a part of it. So many of us were such idealists. We were going to make the world a better place. Of course, you had to smoke dope and drop LSD to really get into the right state to start changing the world. Then along came Charles Manson, Black September, the Munich Olympics massacre, and so on. Suddenly, idealism went down the drain and we stumbled towards the beginning of the 21st Century.

Along came Bush and his Neocons. Oh my! They narrowly squeaked into power, some would say by stealing the Presidency. No matter. They were in and they took control. The problem was, a large number of Americans were grumbling about it. How to fix the problem?

How convenient. A bunch of Islamic terrorists provided the answer by flying planes into a bunch of buildings. Suddenly, we began hearing about ‘Al Qaeda’. What was this shadowy organization? Oh yeah! Someone called Osama Bin Laden ran it. The trouble is, Osama was an ex-CIA man. He was trained by them, armed by them, and then he broke away from them. So why not pin it all on this ungrateful ingrate? Another problem was that Al Qaeda didn’t actually exist. It still doesn’t exist. Osama doesn’t have an organization. He merely funds any disgruntled ‘terrorist’ who wants to make a statement and hopefully kill himself in the process.

After 9/11 we see the American Constitution being disregarded, a new government organization with the decidedly Nazi sounding name of ‘Homeland Security’ to ‘protect US citizens from terrorist attack’. Unfortunately, the new laws seem to affect American freedoms adversely more than any terrorist. Then it’s hey ho! Off we go to war against a former ally who provided a convenient scapegoat for everything. The problem was, Saddam wasn’t cooperating! Where were the WMD’s Bush and his band of merry fakers had promised us?

No problem. We’ll just keep telling people that we are still looking and when we find a few scraps of old chemical weapons from the 1980’s we’ll tell everyone we found them. Yep! That will work if we keep repeating it enough. We’ll wrap it up in good ol’ Christian ‘faith’ as well, and tell the non-believers that they are the heretics and the bad guys. Repeating the lie until everyone believed it worked for the Nazis and the Communists, didn’t it?

Now, you might have noticed that when Bush came to power, several governments around the world changed at about the same time. Blair in the UK, Howard in Australia, Taksin right here, Koizumi in Japan, and so on. They have all become the little lap dogs of the American prez. When he says poop, they ask how long do you want it, sir?

Like Mr Bush, they have tried to socially reengineer their countries to conform to their extremely conservative agendas. Here, we are not allowed to buy booze or cigarettes at certain times of the day. It doesn’t matter that these are far worse and more addictive than the drugs sold by the thousand plus ‘drug dealers’ who were killed to eliminate the drug trade. They are dead, so who cares? I haven’t noticed any reduction in drunkenness as a result. We just have to go shopping earlier to get our fixings if we want them. Or wait until the early evening to start our debauchery again. Has anyone noticed a reduction in the drug trade either? Nowadays it’s just much better organized and not so well publicized. The kingpins weren’t killed were they? The bluenoses spoil my video movies by blacking out people drinking and smoking, and nipples. But the violence remains in all its graphic gruesomness.

I could go on and on, but you get the idea. Governments around the world these days are more concerned with telling us how to behave and to do their bidding. Instead, they should be providing the basic requirements to make our lives comfortable and hassle free. Sure, here in Thailand we have a nice new BTS and MRT (both planned and started long before the current government came to power). We have lots of new highways, some of which our grandchildren will still be paying for because of the vast amount of public funding that ‘disappeared’. The expressways that were supposed to link up in Bang Na is a graphic example. And we have the 30 Baht medical scheme that provides such basic medical service it’s probably safer to stay home instead.

In America they have a new way to control the populace: Fear. Fear of the terrorists, that shadowy bunch of people no one has ever been able to find. Maybe some of those people in Gitmo are terrorists. Are they a part of Al Qaeda? I doubt it. Even Osama seems too slippery to be caught. Then again, perhaps no one really wants to catch him. It might be too embarrassing.

The security people who are supposed to be responsible for ensuring the safety of the people have swallowed the lies whole. They are constantly looking for terrorists, while people’s basic human rights and freedoms have gradually been whittled down. These days, you can be arrested in the US simply because someone ‘thinks’ you might be a terrorist, or because you said something that sounded vaguely like something a ‘terrorist’ might say.

It’s a sad world, my friends. Our governments have taken over the role of our consciences, but without any of the common sense we would normally apply. They have tried to impose not only their moral values on us, but their religious beliefs as well. What have we done? Have we let the devil into our midst? Is it too late to reverse things?

Don’t ask me. I’m no one and I don’t even believe in God, or the devil. But I do have a strong belief in mankind. I think the current worldwide political situation is an aberration. Once the main players are sidelined things will get better. We may never go back to the security and comfort we enjoyed before Bush and Co. It up to us to try though, isn’t it?

Another fruit of the politically correct refusal to ask Muslim applicants for airport jobs hard questions about their views on jihad and Sharia. Of course, honest answers could not be expected; but if officials were even aware of the nature of jihad preaching and recruitment, they could watch for some of the danger signs.

The obvious thing to do, of course, is to bar Muslims from sensitive positions until Western Muslim communities can produce some reliable assurance that those who take such positions will not be jihadists. But that will never happen, not least because Western authorities calling for it would fold in the face of the Muslim indignation that would follow such a declaration. But in light of the fact that Muslims themselves have made no organized attempt to expel jihadists or teach against their ideology in mosques in Western countries, it’s an entirely reasonable measure.

“Plane plot involved ‘explosive cocktail,’ official says,” from CNN:

Among those arrested were a Muslim charity worker and a Heathrow Airport employee with an all-area access pass, according to Britain’s Channel 4.

Do you know how to tell if you are a real paranoid?

That’s when you say, “I know I’m paranoid…..” and then you look around furtively and ask, “But am I paranoid enough?”

Talking to some of my Thai friends lately, I’m beginning to wonder who is really paranoid. I keep getting emails from people warning me that the government is planning another pogrom against us farungs. No specifics. Just a warning to be prepared for more. More what? They don’t say. But it doesn’t sound good. It looks like the Interior Ministry edict about foreigners setting up nominee companies to buy property may just be the tip of the iceberg.

We foreigners are an easy target. After all, we can’t vote. We have no say in how the country is run. All we do is provide the knowledge and money to keep a large part of the economy running.

I’m beginning to look around furtively.

The signs of discontent started just after the Singapore deal, even before the street demonstrations in Bangkok that forced Taksin to step down without actually saying he was resigning. I was at a golf club having a meal with some Thai colleagues. One of them was a Mom Rachawong. I was startled when he started criticizing Taksin, accusing him of being the most corrupt despot Thailand has ever seen. An outburst like that in public from an MR was unheard of.

Since then, I have met many Thais from all walks of life who have complained about the political situation, and Taksin in particular. One taxi driver complained that ever since Taksin authorized another 8,000 taxis for the streets of Bangkok it was extremely difficult to make ends meet. He wasn’t angling for a tip. He was speaking passionately in Thai and what he had to say must have had Taksin’s ears burning. I gave the driver a tip anyway.

Then I met this week with a couple of my clients. One is a mid-thirties businesswoman, successful and usually totally uninterested in Thai politics. This time, however, in the middle of a general discussion she let go a broadside against Taksin I couldn’t believe. It’s obvious that the PM has upset a lot of people. She accused him of screwing the country, of being corrupt, of damaging ordinary people with his policies, and on and on. I sat there with my jaw hanging down. I’d heard a few Thais complain before, but this usually quiet and unassuming lady lashed out with a venom that was amazing. She was obviously upset.

We had been discussing the state of the economy. I was bemoaning the rising cost of gas and the effect it was having on business. That’s when she started.

She said that after the demonstrations against him when he was forced to step down, she was hoping he would get out of politics completely. After all, he was super rich. Why did he need to have so much power? She couldn’t believe it when he just resumed business as usual, even after His Majesty had spoken to him.

“He’s even passing legislation, even though he can’t do that as caretaker PM.”

She pointed to the obvious corruption and cronyism going on at the new airport. But what really gets her blood boiling, even now, is the Singapore deal. She said he had blatantly manipulated the system for his own gain and avoided paying any taxes. Even though technically what he did was not against the law, the Thai people didn’t see it that way. She asked, “If he can do that, why should I be honest and pay my taxes? I’ll tell you why! Because I am Thai and I don’t want to hurt my country or my fellow citizens. But Taksin has made a mockery of everything we Thais stand for.”

Strong words indeed.

I had a meeting today with another Thai who has been my friend almost from the first day I arrived in Thailand. He has a lucrative concession business out at Don Muang airport. I asked him how his business is. That unleashed another round of harsh criticism. He pointed out that it should have been easy to transfer his concession to the new airport. Instead, he didn’t even know who to talk to. He did manage to talk to one of the top brass, but all he said was that they are ‘consolidating’ the concessions and the one who wins the bid will then farm out the contracts to successful bidders. The potential for extreme corruption is obvious. You have to ask who will win the consolidated concession, don’t you?

Then he raged that even if he did manage to get a concession, the terms of the contract will state that he has to implement his business within one week. That was when he started going ballistic.

“How can I possibly scout the airport to figure out where to site my concession stalls?” he asked. “They won’t even let me on the premises. I had to pay out 6,000 Baht for a flight ticket I didn’t even want on the day Taksin flew in to test the airport just so that I could get a pass into the terminal.”

He went on, “There is no way I can possibly set everything up in one week. I have to print all my sales and marketing materials again with the correct information. I have to hire people to install my concessions. I just can’t do it. So I am seriously considering just closing down the business and walking away. I have already started laying off my staff because I can’t afford to keep them while I wait to resolve this mess. The airport will lose the 3 million Baht I currently generate each month for the airport authority at Don Muang as well.”

Then he started talking about all the other problems he felt Taksin has caused. He said that the crackdown on bars was hurting the entire tourism business and driving away the very people Thailand relies on for so much of it’s national income. He said he couldn’t understand why the entertainment owners didn’t all band together to present a united front.

“One way to fight this stupidity is to shut down the whole industry and send all the staff back home to tell their families that Taksin’s policies are responsible for putting them all out of work. That would send a very strong message, and it might even open his eyes to the damage he is doing to the country.”

My friend also accused Taksin of using taxpayer’s money to go up to Esarn to hand out money to ensure he will be re-elected in October. “That is our money he is spending for his own gain.”

When I asked him if he thought the Democrats might have a chance of forming a government after the next elections, he laughed. “Khun Abhisit challenged Taksin to a debate similar to the debates they have in real democracies. But Taksin wouldn’t accept the challenge. He only likes to get up and talk alone. He couldn’t win a debate and he knows it. The problem is, the Democrats are not strong enough in Esarn, and so there is no way they can win enough seats to form a government.”

He went on, “Taksin won’t get a majority in the next election though. He might win 300 seats, so he will need a coalition partner like Banharn. This wouldn’t be so bad if Taksin would let Banharn be PM, but that won’t happen. Taksin wants to keep the power firmly in his hands.”

Won’t that generate even more unrest, I asked?

He said that for sure the people would come out onto the streets again and the problems could continue for a long time. Not a scenario to look forward to.

I told him about an experience I had a couple of days ago. A Thai businessman had come down from Udorn to visit a colleague at the apartment building opposite my house. He parked his pickup outside my house for the night because by the time he finished his business he couldn’t drive home. The gas stations are all shut at night on Taksin’s orders. The next morning, this chap came out to find that thieves had stolen his expensive spare wheel and tried to steal his headlights as well.

The poor man stood there in the street screaming so that all the neighbors could hear, “This is all Taksin’s fault! If the gas stations were allowed to open 24 hours a day like before I would have driven home last night.”

It’s always the little things that end up bringing down the high and mighty. It will be interesting to see how many little things it takes before we see a resolution to the current political mess we are in. Or will Taksin prove he is a statesman before that and step down so that the country can regain stability?

In an update on this story, the Indonesian Foreign minister discards national police deputy spokesman Anton Bahrul Alam’s assertion that “We can and will prevent them from leaving.”

From Reuters: “Indonesia says can’t keep militants out of Mideast”

JAKARTA (Reuters) – Indonesia has no way to prevent Muslim militants travelling from its shores to the Middle East or elsewhere to wage war against Israel, Foreign Minister Hassan Wirajuda said on Tuesday. The self-styled head of the Jakarta-based ASEAN Muslim Youth Movement said last week that more than 200 militants had been sent on missions to attack Israel’s interests and countries that support the Jewish state.

Militant groups in Indonesia, the world’s most populous Muslim nation, have made claims in the past of sending volunteers to participate in conflicts overseas which have often proved exaggerated.

“We are a country with a system in which people are extremely free to travel overseas and no exit permit is required,” Minister Wirajuda told reporters.

“Therefore we don’t have a method to prevent people (from travelling) but we have issued a travel advisory… to remind our citizens that it is not safe to travel to Lebanon for any purpose,” he said.

Wirajuda’s comments appeared to contradict earlier police statements that they would prevent people from going to the Middle East or elsewhere to fight.

[...]

On Tuesday, a spokesman for a group led by firebrand Muslim cleric Abu Bakar Bashir, the Indonesian Mujahideen Council, said 500 volunteers were ready to be dispatched to Lebanon and Palestinian territory.

“We should not let anyone stand in the way of the intention by some Muslims to go to Lebanon and Palestine,” Fauzan al Anshori told Metro TV.

Wirajuda said sending volunteers to fight Israeli troops would be a “reckless” move.

But go ahead and travel to Lebanon, and we’ll trust you not to fight.

“There are many ways to carry out jihad (holy struggle). What’s most urgently needed by the Lebanese is humanitarian assistance such as medicine and medical supplies,” he said.

An opportunity squandered in Pakistan, as a cabinet committee chips away at reforms of the Hudood rape laws. Sharia Alert from the Daily Times: “Hudood Ord amendments: Cabinet body to delete adult age clause” ISLAMABAD: The cabinet committee formed to review draft amendments to the Hudood Ordinances has decided to delete a proposed change that would make sex with a girl below the age of 16 the offence of rape.

Cabinet sources told Daily Times that several minister had objected to this clause when the draft amendments were presented to the cabinet for approval a week ago. The prime minister formed a six-member ministerial committee to resolve differences over the amendments. The sources said Sher Afgan Niazi, the parliamentary affairs minister, Aftab Sherpao, the interior minister, and Dr GG Jamal, the culture minister, had argued at the cabinet meeting that this amendment would cause trouble in rural and tribal areas where girls are traditionally married off at a young age. The ministers argued that in Islam, a woman becomes an adult when she reaches puberty.

The sources said the six-member ministerial committee had now communicated to some cabinet members that it had decided to remove this condition. The other amendment that ministers objected to was one that would give equal weight to the testimonies of adult male and female witnesses in rape cases.

They had also voiced concern at the timing of the bill, but the prime minister had rejected this concern, the sources said. The bill was to be tabled in the National Assembly on Monday, but was delayed on account of the ministers’ objections. It is now expected to be tabled on Wednesday, after a parliamentary party meeting of the ruling coalition on Tuesday endorses the bill.

Following intellectuals’ letter, Prof. Noam Chomsky explains his doctrine, discusses danger of Israel’s nukes compared to ‘Iranian threat,’ global media’s role in escalating Mideast conflict and US’s place in picture

By Merav Yudilovitch

08/09/06 “Ynet” — – Last week, a group of renowned intellectuals published an open letter blaming Israel for escalating the conflict in the Middle East. The letter, which mainly referred to the alignment of forces between Israel and the Palestinian Authority, caused a lot of anger among Ynet and Ynetnews readers, particularly due to its claim that the Israeli policy’s political aim is to eliminate the Palestinian nation.

The letter was formulated by art critic and author John Berger and among its signatories were Nobel Prize winner, playwright Harold Pinter, linguist and theoretician Noam Chomsly, Nobel Prize laureate Jos é Saramago, Booker Prize laureate Arundhati Roy, American author Russell Banks, author and playwright Gore Vidal, and historian Howard Zinn. Continue reading »

© 2010 Whiteboysinasia.com Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha